addarrow-downarrow-outlinearrow-outline-downarrow-outline-leftarrow-outline-uparrow-upclosedownloadformat-pdfhelpinfoinfo-outlinelink-external-outlinemenusearchsource-handshakesource-klsource-web

How PPPs Can Help

Governments enter into public-private partnerships (PPPs) to increase the availability, quality, and resilience of infrastructure and public services, while sharing the risk involved in providing them with the private sector.  

Well-structured and managed PPPs can help achieve these objectives in several ways.

Potential benefits

  1. Mobilizing additional funding for infrastructure
  2. Improving planning, coordination and project selection
  3. Providing better value for money
  4. Ensuring transparency
  5. Reducing construction time and costs
  6. Improving service delivery
  7. Ensuring regular maintenance

1. Mobilizing additional funding for infrastructure

Governments often turn to PPPs because they recognize that more investment in infrastructure is needed, but cannot afford to undertake projects through traditional public procurement.

Although this is one of the most common motivations for using PPPs, it is also among the most debated. The extent to which PPPs genuinely enable governments to increase spending in infrastructure depends on the nature of the project, and of a government’s particular constraints. Generally speaking:

  • some PPPs create additional funds for infrastructure, by introducing user charges, collecting revenues more effectively, or finding alternative revenue sources—these options are also open to governments outside of the framework of a PPP, but can be harder to implement given managerial or political constraints; and  
  • others are ultimately paid for partly or entirely from the public purse, through availability or other payments.

Note that while a direct reduction in financial obligations of the government depends on the project structure, the fiscal risks associated with providing infrastructure are always reduced in PPPs through the transfer of some of project risks to the private sector. The financial obligations that remain with government create contingent liabilities (potential liabilities in the future) that need to be accounted and planned, for in the present.

2. Improve planning, coordination and project selection

PPPs can help improve infrastructure project selection, by harnessing the analysis and ideas of private sector investors, whose financial returns depend on getting cost and revenue forecasts right.

During tender, private investors and lenders undertake their own project analysis based on their experience and strong, profit-driven incentive to carefully assess benefits and costs. The tender process itself acts as an effective filter for non-viable projects.

3. Providing better value for money

PPPs can also achieve better value for money—whether through reduced costs or improved quality. This value can be achieved through several mechanisms, often called value drivers. These include:

  • lowering whole-of-life costs by bundling responsibility for construction and maintenance;
  • ensuring adequate funding for maintenance;
  • providing opportunity and incentives for innovation and efficiency by the private sector party; and
  • ensuring accountability through performance-linked remuneration.

The impact of these value drivers depends on the appropriate allocation of risk between the public and private parties to the contract.

4. Ensuring transparency

Lack of good governance increases costs and reduces quality by:

  • making potential investors and lenders worry (increasing the cost of financing);
  • reducing competitive pressure on bidders (by increasing costs and reducing quality and expediency of solutions proposed); and
  • increasing the likelihood of rent-seeking, bribery, and other forms of corruption (adding cost and delay to project implementation and reducing quality of performance).

PPPs provide an opportunity to incorporate good corporate governance practices into every aspect of project design, tender and implementation, and to provide transparent, fair treatment and open competition.

For example:

  • the use of financial and fiduciary management, in particular ring fencing revenue and subsidy flows from the government;
  • improved public access to information about the project and the procurement process, for example through a dedicated project website to attract bidders and improve competition;  
  • through enhanced project procurement processes to increase competition, transparency and control; and
  • through the over-riding monitoring function of the lenders, who stand to lose money if, for example, corrupt practices are encountered in the project.

5. Reducing construction time and cost

A common rationale for involving the private sector in infrastructure provision is that the private sector is more efficient and effective at managing the construction phase of the project cycle. Studies in the PPP programs of the UK and Australia shed light on this.

  • In the United Kingdom, the National Audit Office surveyed the proportion of PPP projects coming in over budget or late, and compared this with previous assessments of the performance of publicly-procured projects. PPPs outperformed public projects, particularly on cost by imposing greater discipline through incentives created through the contract.
  • In Australia, two studies (Duffield, and Infrastructure Partnerships Australia) disaggregated the project development process and found that PPP projects have lower project cost over-runs than traditionally procured public projects. However, when comparing the timing of project delivery, the studies found that both PPPs and traditionally-procured projects took longer than expected.

6. Improving service delivery

There have been relatively few studies on the impact of private sector participation on infrastructure delivery. What evidence there is suggests that private sector participation can improve service delivery and management compared with publically-run infrastructure services. Examples of this evidence include:

  • A 2009 study by the World Bank (by Gassner et al) analyzed the effect of private sector participation through concessions and the full privatization in over 1,200 water and electricity utilities in 71 countries. It found significant efficiency gains when private sector participation was introduced—including reduced water losses, increased staff efficiency, increased coverage and daily hours of service.
  • A 2009 study by Marin of private participation in urban water utilities analyzed 65 large water PPPs and similar contracts (including management contracts) in, also finding that introducing a private operator consistently improved operational efficiency and service quality.

7. Ensuring regular maintenance

Infrastructure assets are often poorly maintained due to poor planning or deferred maintenance.  Political incentives often prejudice infrastructure expenditure towards new assets over maintaining existing assets.

Regular maintenance maintains service standard and minimizes lifecycle costs by not allowing the asset to degrade to the point that costly rehabilitation is needed. Evidence of this includes:

  • The World Bank's Africa infrastructure diagnostic study estimates that preventative maintenance for the roads sector in Africa could save $2.6 billion a year in capital expenditures rehabilitation.
  • A review of road maintenance by the South African National Roads Agency indicates that delaying road maintenance for three years leads to increased costs of six times the original costs of preventative maintenance. If road maintenance is delayed for five years, costs rise to 18 times the preventive cost.

By bundling construction (or rehabilitation) and on-going maintenance into a single contract, PPPs incentivize the private operator to build to standards that minimize the need for and cost of future maintenance. The contract also creates strong incentives to carry out adequate maintenance:

  • when the operator’s revenues depend on user-fees, they have the incentive to attracts users with well-maintained assets; and
  • under government-pays PPP, payment depends on the availability of the asset and the operators ability to meet specified service quality levels.

PPP limitations and the importance of public sector capacity

Achieving these benefits and ensuring they translate into lower infrastructure costs for taxpayers and users, depends on the government structuring, procuring, and implementing PPPs effectively. This can be difficult where low public sector capacity means that governments lack the resources and skill to structure and manage PPPs well.

It is important to emphasize that there are problems that PPPs cannot solve, or that PPPs may exacerbate. For example:

  • PPPs may appear to relieve funding problems more than is actually the case, as the government’s fiscal commitments to PPPs can be unclear. This can lead to governments accepting higher fiscal commitments and risk under PPPs than would be consistent with prudent public financial management. 
  • While PPPs can contribute to better project analysis and adoption of innovative ideas and practices, responsibility for planning and project selection still remains primarily with the public sector, and the unclear fiscal costs and contractual inflexibility of PPPs can make these tasks more difficult.
  • The advantages of private sector efficiency in managing infrastructure, and improved incentives to carry out regular maintenance, also depend on effective PPP contracting and procurement by the government.

These limitations mean that PPPs cannot be seen as a panacea to solve infrastructure performance problems. Sound public decision-making resulting from adequate capacity and governance are necessary prerequisites for successful PPPs or public investment projects. 

Learn More

    • 2014
    • Asian Development Bank (ADB), World Bank Group (WBG), Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), PPIAF

    How PPPs help

    PPP Reference Guide

    The PPP Reference Guide presents a global overview of the diversity of approaches and experiences in the implementation of PPPs, providing an entry point to the substantial body of knowledge on PPPs that has been built up by practitioners in governments, the private sector, international institutions, and academics. It seeks to provide advice on what PPP practitioners should know, rather than provide advice on what to do. Inadequate infrastructure is a constraint on growth worldwide, particularly in developing countries. Infrastructure services are often inadequate to meet demand, resulting in congestion or service rationing. Infrastructure services are also often of low quality or reliability, while many areas are simply un-served....

    • 2010
    • House of Lords
    • UK Government

    Private Finance Projects and Off-Balance Sheet Debt

    Volume I - HL Paper 63-I

    Expectations of public services have risen steadily over many years and Governments have struggled to satisfy them within the constraints of annual public spending limits. Growing public payrolls tend to pre-empt resources for maintenance and renewal of infrastructure. Governments have understandably looked for new ways to fund investment and reduce the risks of implementation. One is Private Finance Projects (PFPs), financed by privately-raised debt and equity and paid for by public authorities over many years.  

    • 2007
    • The Allen Consulting Group
    • University of Melbourne, Infrastructure Partnerships Australia

    Performance of PPPs and Traditional Procurement in Australia

    This study of the performance of Public-Private-Partnerships (PPPs) and traditional procurement is the first of its kind to be undertaken in Australia. Cost performance and timeliness outcomes were measured relative to budget for the management and construction of public infrastructure projects. The study is based on detailed analysis of publicly available data for a sample of 21 PPP projects and 33 traditional projects.

    • 2009
    • Katharina Gassner, Alexander Popov, Nataliya Pushak
    • World Bank Group (WBG), PPIAF

    Does Private Sector Participation Improve Performance in Electricity and Water Distribution?

    The authors examine the question of private versus public performance in a natural monopoly setting in electricity and water distribution, addressing the shortfalls of earlier research and arrive at fact-based conclusions that are robust globally. Using a data set of more than 1,200 utilities in 71 developing and transition economies, this study finds that privately operated utilities convincingly outperform state-run ones in operational performance and labor productivity. This book compares the change over time in performance measures for the two groups of utilities and isolates the effect of PSP from time trends and firm-specific characteristics. It accounts for ex-ante differences between state-owned enterprises that were selected...

    • 2009
    • Philippe Marin
    • PPIAF, World Bank Group (WBG)

    Public-Private Partnerships for Urban Water Utilities

    A Review of Experiences in Developing Countries

    This study seeks to contribute to the understanding of the performance of PPP projects in urban water utilities in developing countries. It focuses on projects in which a private operator is introduced to run the utility, consequently excluding build, operate, and transfer projects and  similar arrangements limited to the construction and operation of treatment facilities. It reviews the overall spread of urban water PPPs during the past 15 years and seeks to respond to the questions of whether and how they have helped to improve services and to expand access for the populations concerned. The study analyzes performance data from more than 65 large water PPP projects that have been in place for at least five years (three years in the...

    • 2010
    • National Audit Office, United Kingdom

    The Performance and Management of Hospital PFI Contracts

    This report, which focuses on the stage of the contract once buildings are opened for use, not on the decision to use PFI as a procurement route, suggests that most contracts are performing satisfactorily or better and meeting the expectations of Trusts. However, risks remain and, while many Trusts have recently increased the resources they dedicate to managing PFI contracts, some Trusts are not devoting enough resources. Twelve per cent (9 of the 76) operational PFI contracts have no-one from the public sector assigned to contract management. It is likely that Trusts will be expected to make efficiency savings over the next few years, but their ability to make savings from their PFI contracts is very limited. Because Trusts pay an...

    • 2016
    • Jomo KS, Anis Chowdhury, Krishnan Sharma, Daniel Platz
    • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA)

    Public-Private Partnerships and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

    Fit for purpose?

    In light of a cautious emphasis given to public-private partnerships (PPPs) as a mechanism to finance infrastructure projects and highlighting the need for capacity building and knowledge sharing at the Third International Conference on Financing for Development in Addis Ababa, this paper reviews the extant literature on the subject and identifies areas requiring better understanding and institutional innovation for ensuring value for money, minimizing contingent fiscal risk and improving accountability. An institutional capacity to create, manage and evaluate PPPs is essential to ensure that they become an effective instrument of delivery of important services, such as infrastructure. There is also a need for a common definition of...

    • 2016
    • María José Romero
    • European Network on Debt and Development (Eurodad)

    What lies beneath?

    A critical assessment of PPPs and their impact on sustainable development

    This report shows that the last decade has seen a huge increase in the amount of money invested in PPPs in developing countries. From 2004-2012, investments in PPPs increased by a factor of six, from US$ 22.7 billion to US$ 134.2 billion. This has been driven by economic growth and thus the need for infrastructure development, but also by low interest rates in developed countries which has driven investors to ‘search for yield’ elsewhere. Although investments in PPPs fell in 2013 to US$ 84.4 billion, current estimates indicate that the developing world will experience a new wave of PPPs in the near future. However, it is important to note that despite the promotion of PPPs, private finance only provides about 15–20 per cent of total...

    • 2005
    • Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC)

    Delivering the PPP Promise

    A review of PPP Issues and Activity

    Offers a broad overview of PPPs in Europe, outlining their advantages and disadvantages, and reviewing PPP activity by country. 

    • 2009
    • Eduardo Engel, Ronald Fischer, Alexander Galetovic
    • Universidad de Chile

    Public-Private Partnerships: When and How

    When are public-private partnerships (PPPs) better than conventional provision and regulated privatization? And should PPP contracts be structured and governed when this is the case? We show that the defining features of a PPP are (i) bundling of construction and operation, (ii) private but temporary ownership of assets and (iii) intertemporal risk sharing with the public sector. Thus some characteristics of PPPs are akin to privatization while others are similar to conventional provision. Since incentives for efficient building and management are related to bundling, PPPs are closer to privatization in this regard. As the discounted government budget under a PPP is similar to that under conventional provision, PPPs are closer to...

    • 2011
    • Ronald Fischer
    • Oxford University, International Growth Center , London School of Economics (LSE)

    The Promise and Peril of Public Private Partnerships

    Lessons from the Chilean Experience

    This short paper explores PPPs in Chile, which has one of the most successful PPP programs among developing countries. The program has significantly improved the country’s road, airport and seaport infrastructure. 

    • 2014
    • Asian Development Bank (ADB), World Bank Group (WBG), Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), PPIAF

    Como las APP pueden ayudar

    Asociationes Publico-Privadas: Guia de Referencia

    • 2015
    • European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC), European Investment Bank (EIB)

    PPP Motivations and Challenges for the Public Sector

    Why (not) and How

    This publication has been prepared to contribute to and stimulate discussions on public-private partnerships (PPPs) as well as to foster the diffusion of best practices in this area. Policy-makers and project procuring authorities make reference to a range of motivations to justify the use of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs). This report seeks to identify the key motivations that have been used in communicating the rationale to use PPPs. This may be helpful for those seeking to establish, expand or improve their PPP programmes. Similarly, identifying the challenges in implementing PPPs can help to address the potential limits to their delivery. The report identifies the main challenges for the public sector and proposes some of the...

For legal and regulatory resources go to PPPIRC

Explore PPP Cycle